Rittman
City Council Met in
A Regular Meeting
on Monday, January 14, 2008 at 7:00 p.m.
| Members
Present: |
Darrell
Carey, Glen Russell, Charles Copley, |
| |
Lynn Beaumont,
James Johnson and Richard Lapehn |
| Members
Absent: |
None |
| Presiding: |
William
Robertson |
Invocation was
given by: Sister Joan Rader, P.O. followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
Approval
of Minutes – December 3, 2007
Copley moved to approve, all Yeas on roll call and motion
carried.
Workshop
- None
Citizens Forum - No comments
Old
Business - None
New
Business
a.
Motion to Appoint Raynor Shook to the City Records Commission
as the
Archivist
Lapehn so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
b.
Motion to Appoint Jon Lance to the Planning Commission for Another
3
Year Term
Beaumont so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
c.
Motion to Appoint Steve Johnson to the Planning Commission for
a 3
Year Term
Carey so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
d.
Motion to Appoint Keely Dreher to the Civil Service Commission
for
Another 6-Year Term
Johnson so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
e.
Motion to Appoint Jon Lance to the Fair Housing Board for Another
3
Year Term
Lapehn so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
f.
Motion to Appoint Isaac Rufener, Jr. to the Recreation & Parks
Advisory
Committee for Another 2-Year Term
Russell so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
g.
Motion to Appoint Harold Laurila to the Wayne County Health Advisory
Council as the City of Rittman Representative for another 3-Year
Term
Copley so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
h.
Res. No. 7471 A Resolution of the Council of the City of Rittman,
Wayne
and Medina Counties Ohio, Authorizing the Finance Director to
Request Advance Payment on Current Collection of Real Estate Taxes
Due of Said City from the Wayne County Auditor. Three Readings.
Res. No. 7471 was read on first reading.
Beaumont inquired as to the reason we make this request.
Finance Director Mann advised if they don’t request advance
payment they have to wait until the county was completely done
with their property tax collection before the city could get any
of its money. Mann advised if they request the money, the county
sends it to the city in four separate disbursements otherwise
they just hold it.
Copley moved to suspend the rules and have second and third reading,
all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
Res. No. 7471 was read on second and third reading. Russell moved
to adopt, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
i.
Res. No. 7472 A Resolution of the Council of the City of Rittman,
Wayne
and Medina Counties Ohio, Authorizing the Finance Director to
Request Advance Payment on Current Collection of Estate Taxes
Due of Said City from the Wayne County Auditor. Three Readings.
Res. No. 7472 was read on first reading. Johnson moved to suspend
the rules and have second and third reading, all Yeas on roll
call and motion carried. Res. No. 7472 was read
on second and third reading. Russell moved to adopt, all Yeas
on roll call and motion carried.
j.
Discussion of an Ordinance Regulating Traffic Control for Contractors
Working on City Streets Russell indicated he would like this issue
looked into because he felt it could be a hazard during the time
contractors were working if a flagger wasn’t used to help
move the traffic through the construction site safely. Russell
cited the current contractors working on Sunset Drive installing
the gas line.
Boggs agreed and advised he felt there should be something regulating
(contractors) on a through street. He advised those contractors
currently were taking up almost a whole block and the driver was
at their mercy and another vehicle could be coming and you wouldn’t
see it until you were halfway through (the construction site).
Boggs advised he believed these contractors were just trying to
“save a few bucks” by not having a flagger. He advised
he could do a little research to find out whether or not other
cities have an ordinance regulating such.
Mayor Robertson inquired if an ordinance was required or if it
was something the police could request of the contractors.
Boggs advised we probably could talk with them, but he felt there
would be “more teeth in it” if they had some type
of ordinance. Boggs advised normally they would have a permit
and they could have attached such to the permit, but in this case
the contractors have a standing bond with the city so they were
not required to come in for a permit each time. Boggs advised
the city did receive notification they were going to be doing
this work, but there was no permit issued. Boggs advised he did
have a discussion with them as the city was concerned with how
they (Columbia Gas) were going to be laying the pipe. Boggs advised
he could do some research and find out if other cities were doing
anything similar and if not they could look at doing something
and make a recommendation to Council if they wished.
Russell advised he felt if they had something (in writing) then
if and when people contracted to work here it would be with the
understanding they would be required to provide it (a flagger)
upfront and we wouldn’t have a problem later. Russell advised
he noticed (the workers) were scattered (on Sunset) from Ritter
all the way down to Terrace with their equipment and there was
dirt in part of the lane and at Terrace there was a tractor on
each side, which really “cramped in” the traffic.
Russell advised he was concerned there would be a bad accident.
Beaumont advised he knew that when companies such as oilrigs or
such were working in the county or townships they had to clean
up any mud left on the street. Beaumont inquired if the city had
an ordinance stating (these contractors) have to clean the road.
Bower advised yes.
Boggs advised they would look into it and propose something to
Council.
k.
Discussion of an Ordinance Regulating Fencing in a Commercial
or
Industrial District
Russell advised the bar on South Main Street (BG’s Main
Event) put up a fence right next to the sidewalk and put a tarp
inside the fenced area and he felt it looked really bad. Russell
advised he felt they needed to have some type of control on what
was being “put up”. Russell advised the (residential
districts) have to get approval (for fencing) and he didn’t
know if this business did the same or just “put it up”
on their own. Russell advised he felt it was pretty shabby looking
out on the main street.
Discussion included the reasoning for such was most likely due
to allowing outdoor smoking.
Boggs advised to his knowledge no one came into City Hall to get
a permit. Boggs advised they researched the ordinances and they
could find nothing regulating fencing in commercial or industrial
districts.
Russell inquired as to what was done with Mr. Snell. Russell advised
he realized that (Snell) built bigger than he was supposed to
and the city made him take it down.
Boggs advised that (incident) was a residential district.
Russell advised he felt there should be something they could do
to act on this particular problem.
Bower advised our current zoning does not regulate fences in a
commercial district.
Russell advised then we probably needed to take a look at it.
Copley inquired if they would want to regulate the other commercial/industrial
districts as well. He advised down the street from BG’s
was another bar (Dom’s), which has a fence the same size.
Johnson advised as well as the VFW.
Russell advised and if we get fences all the way down Main Street
it was going to get pretty interesting. Russell advised he felt
they did need to take a look at it, as it didn’t look “kosher”
to him.
Mayor Robertson advised there had to be some risk to regulating
such as well.
Johnson advised if we regulate it then everyone who already has
such a fence would be grandfathered.
Robertson agreed and advised we can’t change what was already
there.
Russell advised maybe not, but there might be other people wanting
to do it.
Beaumont inquired if it was a permanent structure, as he thought
it was going to be temporary.
Robertson advised it looked permanent with fence posts and a stockade
style fence.
Russell advised he thought they needed to do some research to
see if the city could do something about, as he felt they needed
to pass some type of ordinance so this wouldn’t happen in
the future. Russell advised if we don’t have one then let’s
make one.
Carey advised there should be some type of guideline as to what
type of fence or how tall it could be like the residential districts.
Russell advised there should be some way they could challenge
it, as it was right onto the sidewalk.
Carey advised but (BG’s) weren’t against any ordinance
currently.
Copley inquired if it was a C-2 (Central Business) district.
Boggs advised actually it was a (M-3) Mixed Industrial district.
Boggs advised there was absolutely nothing on (regulating) fences
other than residential (districts).
Lapehn advised with industrial zoning the company with backhoes
and other equipment out front was a necessity for his business.
Robertson indicated he wasn’t sure they wanted to start
requiring permits as that could become (cumbersome).
Boggs advised he didn’t feel permitting was the issue as
much as he wasn’t sure how they would do the ordinance.
He advised it would depend on what they were planning on doing
and he was kind of surprised they didn’t have any inquiries
and to his knowledge no one inquired at City Hall.
Carey advised since the tarp wasn’t a permanent structure
a permit was probably not required anyhow.
Boggs advised his guess was the tarp was going to be there indefinitely.
Beaumont advised it was kind of surprising as this business had
done a lot of improvements and really made it look nice.
Boggs advised yes and he (the owner) took away from that (improvement)
and it was all hid now.
Copley advised he heard mention that it was being used for outdoor
smoking, but he didn’t believe that would be a legitimate
use either.
Johnson advised normally when a business such as this puts up
a fence it was to get around the drunk in public “thing”
because they were behind the fence and not out in public.
Boggs advised he could call the owner and see what his intentions
were and bring it back to Council.
Russell advised he believed everyone knew how he felt about it.
Robertson advised he didn’t believe they could do anything
with what already exists, but did they want to do something about
future issues (of this nature).
l. Discussion of an Ordinance Regulating Publications
Being Strewn About
the City
Russell advised he has had a lot of complaint calls about The
Trading Post newspapers being thrown on the curb or in the lawn.
Russell advised these people want their papers, but they don’t
want to have to go all the way out to the street to pick their
paper up. Russell advised he believed they needed to take some
steps (toward resolving) this, as he believed the Wooster paper
and the Akron paper make their deliveries to the door. Russell
advised we were allowing people to throw things on the street
and curbs and he felt it wasn’t fair to give someone else
a ticket for littering and yet we were allowing a business to
do the same thing all over the city. Russell advised he didn’t
know what the answer was, but he didn’t know why the paper
was doing it and he hasn’t talked to him, but with the complaints
and the looks of the city he felt they needed to make a “clean
approach”. Russell advised in the spring he was sure they
would have to drive around and clean the city up, but we need
to start now so people were aware of what was going on.
Robertson advised he has heard complaints as well, but he was
at a loss as to what they could do.
Copley advised he received a number of complaints and researched
it a little bit. He advised he couldn’t find anyway to force
them to deliver it where people would want it. He advised he found
a number of cases where cities tried to limit them and it was
shot down in a number of cases he believed.
Russell inquired if Mr. Bower had any recommendations as to what
could be done or if there was an ordinance Council could pass.
Bower advised he tended to agree with (Copley), as it would probably
be an infringement on first amendment rights.
Russell advised then we were telling people they could just throw
litter all over town.
Bower advised playing devils advocate…these people would
say they were not really littering, but delivering a paper as
a service to distinguish it from littering.
Robertson advised The Post would take you off their delivery list
if you call.
Russell advised some people said they called and (delivery) was
stopped for a couple weeks, but it was being dropped off again.
He advised he went out one Sunday and picked his up and about
two hours later he saw he had a second delivery along with others
on his street. He advised he just felt they were doing things
that the city doesn’t need.
Johnson advised he was told (The Post) were getting rid of all
their walking routes and (the papers) were suppose to be at the
end of each driveway, but the problem was some of them don’t
make it to the end of the driveway and were out in the middle
of the road and there could be one neighbor who hasn’t collected
his in five weeks and had a stack of them.
Russell advised people have been saying they weren’t going
to pick them up and by spring we would have a big issue. He advised
he was cleaning his neighbor’s driveway and he got a whole
wad of them stuck up in his snow blower. Russell advised if people
aren’t picking them up, by spring we were going to have
issues all over town.
Robertson suggested calling Bruce Trogdon of the paper and expressing
their displeasure.
Boggs advised he has done that as he received several complaints
as well. He advised he noticed the previous week in the publishers
comments there was mention of the phones would now be answered
on delivery day. Boggs advised if there was a complaint or a problem
a resident could now call in. Boggs advised he was told the same
thing that if you want off the delivery list they would take you
off. Boggs advised the other problem was for whatever reason people
weren’t picking the paper up, as there were several driveways,
which had multiple papers. Boggs advised in his opinion, although
he wouldn’t want to do this, but he felt it was a violation
of littering although he knew they would get into an argument
as to who created it.
Lapehn advised he knew the Akron Beacon Journal on occasion sends
out a free section and it ends up in the same place in his driveway
as the Trading Post. Lapehn advised the Daily Record sends out
a free section on occasion and it ends up on the ground by his
mailbox or in the driveway. He advised he felt they couldn’t
target something like that because it wasn’t just the Trading
Post.
Russell advised they (The Post) were the only ones he has noticed
and he felt delivery of the Akron and Wooster papers wasn’t
a problem as he didn’t see that many scattered all over
town. Russell advised some were given two (Post) papers in their
driveway.
Lapehn advised in his driveway, all (free publications) end up
in the same spot and he felt it was his job to pick them up and
throw them away.
Carey advised the difference with the other (publications) being
delivered directly to the porch was that you (the customer) pay
for the service.
Copley advised they created an ordinance saying whom the trash
bags belonged to when residents were putting them out too early
and he inquired if there was anything they could do with the argument
of who the paper belonged to, as obviously it wasn’t the
homeowner or the person living there that was creating the mess.
Bower inquired if he was suggesting they make the publisher or
the paper culpable or liable.
Copley advised something to that effect yes.
Bower advised he supposed they could look at the littering ordinance
and either file some charges and let municipal court decide it
or get an opinion from the Prosecutor’s office.
Johnson advised the resident isn’t paying for the paper
so he felt it was obviously their (the paper’s) property
until the resident picked it up and if no one picked it up it
should remain The Trading Post’s responsibility. He advised
they were giving it to us, but we don’t have to receive
it.
Beaumont inquired if Boggs had spoke with Bruce (Trogdon) about
this (situation).
Boggs advised he has corresponded with him through e-mail. He
advised he received calls and he knew Russell had several calls
and had called him and they had quite a few people come into City
Hall to complain. Boggs advised he wasn’t sure what to do
about it because he would hate to cite the press and inquired
if they would be infringing upon their rights to some extent.
Boggs advised if you get into the situation where you were going
to try to make the homeowner responsible, we all know how well
that was going to “go down”.
Beaumont inquired if they (the newspaper) said why they were doing
it differently.
Boggs advised he believed they had a large problem with hiring
kids who were undependable and they just decided to have motor
routes only with adults. Boggs advised with a motor route it would
be too much of a pain to drive up each driveway and place them
at the front door.
Beaumont advised obviously the intent was to just throw them as
they were now in plastic bags (to protect against the weather)
and the paper would still be dry when it was picked up.
Boggs advised (Trogdon) claimed they didn’t have any complaints
in Medina where they have been doing this for quite some time.
Russell advised he noticed they were doing the same thing in Creston.
Boggs advised maybe it would make a difference if they threw them
up farther into the driveway. He advised right now they were right
at the end of the drive and they get kicked or blown into the
street.
Beaumont advised he would think those who bought advertising space
would complain that a number of people weren’t seeing the
paper because it was just being thrown. He advised advertising
space was expensive and if people weren’t receiving it and
reading the ads (they might not advertise with them).
Boggs inquired as to how many were still receiving complaint calls,
as he hasn’t heard any recently.
Russell advised he has as he ran into people this week who complained
to him. He advised they want the paper, but they don’t want
it in their driveway or lawn or sidewalk or street. He advised
he didn’t know what the answer was, but he felt maybe they
were allowing something here that they don’t allow others
to do.
Boggs advised he thought maybe they could pass an ordinance making
them put up delivery boxes.
Russell advised he received a complaint that people had the boxes
to put them in and they were still ending up in the driveway or
the street. Russell advised he didn’t know what Wadsworth
does (about this situation) as he hasn’t talked to anyone
in Wadsworth. Russell advised he felt they needed to make some
kind of a statement regarding those being thrown out there (at
the driveway).
Boggs inquired if they wanted him to draft a letter to him (Bruce
Trogdon) on behalf of Council.
Russell advised that would be a start and see what his response
was. Russell advised he agreed with Copley that it went on the
same lines as the guy putting his garbage bags out in the middle
of the week, but there was a case where we know who they belonged
to.
m. Motion to Go Into Executive Session for the Purpose
of Discussing a
Personnel Matter and Invite the City Manager - 7:35 p.m.
–
Russell so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
n.
Motion to Come Out of Executive Session – 7:59 p.m.
–
Johnson so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
City Manager’s Remarks
City Manager Larry Boggs indicated there was a letter prepared for
Council’s signatures necessary according to House Bill 9 if
an elected official wished to designate certain city employees to
attend a Public Records Training class. Boggs advised there was
a class in Canton on February 5th if anyone was interested or they
could sign the letter and designate city employees to attend. Boggs
advised he has already been to two of these classes and the clerk
was registered to attend the class in February.
Boggs advised the Utility Rate & Refuse Board met recently and
it was discussed regarding the senior citizen discount, which currently
was specifically related to the Homestead Exemption. He advised
the Homestead Act now only takes into account your age and not your
income.
Bower interjected and disabled at any age.
Boggs advised the utility board was concerned and recommended Council
look at amending section 975.03 and set some income levels. He advised
he could have something prepared for Council’s consideration
at the next meeting if they so wished.
Bower advised in 2007 the Homestead eligibility income was $27,000
whether married or single and included Social Security. He advised
if ten years ago you applied for Social Security and received it
and your benefit was $8,000 and today it was $12,000 in that $27,000
figure it was only $8,000 as it relates back to the original date.
Bower advised now there were no income limits and he spoke with
the Wayne County Auditor and some very wealthy people in Wooster
over the age of 65 have applied and they (the county) have no choice
but to give them the exemption on their property tax.
Boggs advised he wanted to remind Council they also have only 100
slots for free or reduced trash pickup as well. He advised they
were pretty close to that (number) already.
Copley inquired if they would be looking at mirroring the old State
Homestead Act in our (legislation).
Bower advised that was up to Council as that was policy, but there
was no comparable state statute now for income. He advised our current
ordinance references that old revised code statute which was the
$27,000, but now that current revised code section was age 65 or
disabled. Bower advised Council might also want to consider the
value of the real estate for which the exemption is sought perhaps
based on the county’s duplicate. He advised “let’s
assume I am a zillionaire, let’s assume I live in a multi-million
dollar mansion, and I go see (a lawyer) and he does some estate
planning for me and forms a living trust so my income is less than
$27,000 year and I walk into City Hall and I want 10% off my utility
bill”. Bower advised that was up to Council, but you might
want to think about the value of the parcel which is being served
by water and sewer to put a cap on it.
Beaumont inquired if currently it was based on the title owner of
the property.
Bower advised they have to own it and be 65 or disabled.
Robertson advised it has to be their residence.
Boggs advised it says the eligibility for reduction of water and
sewer service and garbage and rubbish collection rates may be determined
pursuant to the standards for eligibility for the homestead exemption
as set forth in the Ohio Revised Code section 323.511.
Bower advised that does require they live there.
Russell inquired as to how the state reacted when they changed the
homestead, as they didn’t have salary figures listed. He inquired
“how did they go about doing everybody on the homestead, did
they just roll everybody back because they were 65 or what were
the rules on that”.
It was noted, it was based on age or disability only.
Carey advised you had to request it by a certain date to be considered.
Beaumont advised the lines were out the door almost everyday and
all you had to do was prove your age or if you were disabled.
Russell inquired if they could treat this any differently than they
(state) did with the homestead.
Carey advised he didn’t know how much more that would cost
the city if they went with everyone who was at least 65 or disabled.
Beaumont advised we could create our own ordinance.
Russell advised he was trying (to clarify) if we could do that or
stick with what the state did.
Bower advised it was our utility and our home rule so we could do
that (set own standard).
Boggs advised the Utilities Clerk came up with a schedule and he
felt it was a fairly decent place to start if Council would like.
He advised it has an income scale and a recommendation of the discount.
He advised he could provide Council with a copy in their next packet
or prepare an ordinance and Council could amend it if they don’t
like how it reads.
Beaumont suggested they get some facts (for consideration).
Carey advised he believed they were told it would go into effect
in February.
Copley advised at least they could have an ordinance to look at.
Carey advised he was told that currently they were not required
to provide proof of income figures.
Boggs advised they just went by homestead eligibility.
Carey advised it sounded to him like currently all people did was
send in a letter stating they would like a discount on their utility
bill.
Russell inquired as to how many senior citizens were getting a discount.
Boggs advised there actually was not that many taking advantage
of the water and sewer discount, but there were quite a few taking
advantage of the rubbish discount. He wondered how did they have
one and not the other, he didn’t know.
Russell advised we would probably have some senior citizens here
at the next meeting giving us their opinion.
Bower inquired if Boggs knew the website for the census information
for demographics and indicated it should tell how many lower income
senior citizens Rittman has living here.
Carey inquired as to the median poverty level with regards to income.
Boggs advised he didn’t know.
Beaumont advised he felt they should have draft legislation to look
at and consider. He inquired if it would generate comparable people
with the discount as they were currently receiving.
Boggs advised he believed so, yes.
Robertson inquired if Council wished to include property values
or just base it on income alone.
Council was in general agreement and felt it would be easier if
they based it on income alone.
Boggs advised he has a meeting set for Wednesday (1/16) with the
new school Superintendent Jon Ritchie to discuss the School Resource
Officer program to see if the schools wanted to continue that program
or not.
Boggs advised he included the floodplain ordinance in the Council
packet although he didn’t feel it was necessary to rush into
its adoption. Boggs advised in speaking with Dave Simpson, who was
active in floodplain management, and his review of this ordinance
it was pointed out to him that there were some engineering requirements
with the new regulations. Boggs advised there were a couple potential
projects pending, which are in the floodplain and he wanted to take
time to review the new regulations before passing this ordinance
and not hold up pending projects. He advised he didn’t believe
they were under any specific mandate where they had to pass it by
a specific date. Boggs advised unless Council wanted it on the Agenda
sooner, his intention was to postpone it and study it further.
Boggs advised he felt they were in real good standing for Issue
2 funds for $168,000 for the waterline replacement on Industrial
Street. He advised hopefully they would receive the green light
soon and start that project.
Boggs advised they have ordered decals for the city vehicle, which
should be here shortly to help identify our city vehicles.
Boggs advised he wrote to Congressman Regula and Council had a copy
of his response and he would try to set up a meeting soon with his
office and if anyone was interested in attending to let him know
as they were welcome to go with him. He advised he was still hopeful
they could secure some money to assist with the Caraustar and Landis
Ditch problems.
City Manager Boggs advised the Chamber Awards Banquet was this Thursday
(1/17) and he heard they had over 75 people attending so far and
there was probably last minute seats still available if anyone was
interested. He advised it would be held at Rawiga Country Club at
6 pm.
Russell inquired as to where they stood with the recreation center
roof.
Boggs advised he spoke with the architect last week and they were
going to have a final meeting soon. He advised they were pretty
close to closing that out in the very near future.
Russell inquired about the walls (rec. ctr. pool area).
Boggs advised the wall problem has been fixed and indicated the
lawsuit was still pending.
a. Approval of Financial Report for November
Russell so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
b. Approval
of Financial Report for December
Copley so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
c. Finance
Director’s Remarks
Finance Director Lucinda Mann advised she was able to start posting
for 2008 just
today and she appreciated Council’s patience for a little
while longer as it actually takes awhile to go through everything
and make sure everything was correct before she actually rolls the
whole month over into the new year.
Mann advised Thursday and Friday (1/17 & 1/18) they were expecting
Rea & Associates to be here to do some preliminary investigations
for our 2007 audit. Mann advised Council to not be surprised if
they receive the annual letter in the mail asking if they have any
conflicting issues financially with the city.
Mann advised Council to feel free to call her if they have any questions
on the budget especially the newly elected Council Members.
Council Remarks
Council Member Glen Russell thanked everyone for coming.
Council Member Richard Lapehn had no remarks.
Council Member Darrell Carey had no remarks.
Council Member Lynn Beaumont advised he did a personal survey just
to see how many green recycle bins were out on Tuesday morning.
He indicated he counted less than 20. Beaumont advised he really
didn’t understand the recycling program or the benefits of
it. He advised he knew the County Commissioners were here before
he was elected to talk about the recycling program. He advised it
was his understanding that if they don’t increase the citywide
recycling it ultimately would cost money. Beaumont advised he would
like to be educated on it himself before he expected the residents
to do more. He advised he felt they should come up with some way
to educate the citizens to let them know how this ultimately would
help them and help the city.
Beaumont advised recently he attended the Senior Health Fair at
the recreation center and this event gets bigger every year and
he made the statement there that the Rittman Recreation Center was
the crown jewel of this town. Beaumont advised he was aware they
would be going into some new leadership at the facility, but he
would really like the recreation center board to come up with some
type of plan to really promote the center. Beaumont advised from
the number of people who came to Rittman that (health fair) day
the number of non-residents greatly exceeded those from Rittman
who attended. He advised they came to Rittman and saw what we had
to offer and he felt that was something we needed to promote. He
advised the center has never looked nicer and he felt we really
needed to extend ourselves to promote the center. Beaumont advised
he would like to come up with some type of plan such as free swim
nights or entertainment of some kind. He advised he would like to
promote the center and get people who have never visited before
into the facility. He advised there were groups such as church,
civic and different organizations who would be willing to help to
get people to come and use the facility. Beaumont advised he had
no idea as to the membership or the usage over the last couple of
years, but he would like a copy if those numbers were available.
Boggs advised he spoke with the Recreation Director about providing
Council with more statistics and he hoped to have those in the near
future.
Beaumont advised they couldn’t have a long-range plan until
they knew what they have in the form of usage figures. He advised
they needed to know what programs they needed to make more accessible
to older people and the youth.
Russell advised he believed the Recreation Director put something
out not too long ago which outlined how many members and other information,
which he believed were three or four pages given to Council.
Boggs advised that was probably his annual report.
Johnson advised at the last rec. center board meeting they discussed
ways to promote the rec. center and there were some things he mentioned
and was told their hands were tied with advertising as they were
only allotted a $2,000 advertising budget. Johnson advised they
were working trying to get advertising through cable channels to
get their name out there. He advised statistically it was mentioned
that 40% of the membership was non-residents and they were working
on ways to get the recreation center name out there.
Beaumont thanked everyone for coming.
Council Member James Johnson thanked everyone for coming. He advised
with state laws now coming into effect requiring physicals for safety
service personnel and he inquired if there was anything that could
be done to help them and suggested a discount at the recreation
center. Johnson advised he believed there was a small discount given
to other city employees for the center.
Boggs and Mann advised there was no discount currently available
to city employees.
Johnson inquired if there was something that could be done because
he felt the city wasn’t helping them (pass their physical)
in any way. Johnson suggested a possible discount on a rec. center
membership be offered, as these (personnel) were required to pass
an annual physical and yet they had to pay full price to go to the
rec. center inside the city.
Boggs advised the board that (Johnson) he sits on determines the
(rates/discounts).
Mayor Robertson concurred and advised the board sets the rates and
Council approves those rates.
Copley indicated the Recreation Center Board of Directors could
make such a recommendation to Council for consideration.
Johnson advised he would bring it up at the next rec. center board
meeting. He advised maybe it should be looked at for all city employees.
Boggs advised he was sure the employees would be grateful although
he would want to see the employee offered the discount and tie it
to some type of usage. He advised if they don’t use it they
would lose it as he remembered free pool passes being offered and
very few employees used them.
Council Member Charles Copley advised the last couple of meetings
they have discussed the sewer rate and the automatic 6% increase
and he felt it was a pretty convenient situation for someone in
politics to have a rate increase to be automatic. Copley advised
he would prefer that it not be automatic, but he understood it was
part of the loan agreement and that we have to have an automatic
increase to basically support the cost of the sewer fund. Copley
advised he believed they could meet the same circumstances if they
have mandatory review instead of the automatic increase. He advised
what he has done was prepare a revision to 941.05 and he would like
for the Law Director to provide an ordinance to amend that section.
Copley advised basically it removes the automatic increase of 6%
and calls for the City Manager to come to Council annually and recommend
the rate increase and thereby Council would approve or reject it.
Copley advised it would also leave in the wording that if Council
felt it (the rate) needed to be higher or lower they would still
have that authority.
Copley advised over the last two years we have actually raised the
sewer rate twice and we raised the rubbish pickup once and it seemed
to him they were doing a lot of rate increases and yet he can’t
remember Council having a good discussion on how to save costs.
He advised he knew they have saved costs from the codification and
changing companies and it was now online. He advised there has been
some effort, but we haven’t really had any discussions other
than the line item by line item budget review, which frankly to
him really hasn’t been very productive, other than going through
a bunch of numbers for Council. Copley advised what he would like
to see at the next meeting or the one following would be a Workshop
and dedicate it to one department, one budget where Council Members
could bring ideas to save costs for the city for that department.
Copley suggested the Mayor mention it in his column to allow comment
from the residents. Copley advised they needed to keep track of
the ideas on the dry erase board and the clerk could type up a list
and at the next meeting they could go through the status of those
items and see where they stood and if they were viable ideas or
not. Copley advised maybe they could save the city some money and
come up with some new programs as well.
Robertson inquired regarding the budget if they would be reviewing
what was already approved.
Copley advised it was more or less on the upcoming budget or ideas
on what Council Members felt they could save money in certain areas.
He advised they have a new City Manager, a new Finance Director
and some other new employees in the city, who really haven’t
dealt with the budget previously and this would give them an opportunity.
Copley advised it would also be nice if when discussing that particular
department, the department head was present at the meeting. Copley
advised he knew they wouldn’t be able to implement all the
ideas, but he thought maybe something good would come out of it.
Boggs advised when they reviewed the budget last year with the department
heads present he’d like to think they did such a great job,
as there weren’t many questions. Boggs advised they did try
to provide Council with a lot of information, but he was confused
as to whether (Copley) was asking for it to be the same way or something
different.
Copley advised they could do it the same way, but as they have seen
in the past line item by line item doesn’t really cut it as
there were no questions and he felt they weren’t getting anywhere
with that approach. Copley advised he would ask his fellow Council
Members to bring ideas as to how they felt money could be saved
in that department. Copley advised residents could bring their ideas
to discuss as well. Copley advised basically he felt it was a more
orderly way of putting it down on paper and say this is what we
were looking at and decide if it was viable or not and go forward.
Carey advised the problem would be that Council doesn’t have
a day-to-day hands on approach or look at what goes on. Carey advised
we could sit here and say we should cut this, but we don’t
know what was needed in that department on a daily basis.
Copley advised that was why it would be good to have the department
head here and at least put the idea out there and maybe the idea
was lousy and it wouldn’t work, but if the idea was never
put on the table it would never be done.
Russell inquired if he was looking at ways of belt tightening.
Copley advised they were always looking at ways to increase revenue
in his mind, but very seldom did they ask how could we cut costs.
He advised that was just what he has seen in the last few years
and the few years before that even.
Robertson advised it seemed like he wasn’t really looking
at budgets per say, but looking at a department to discuss with
department heads the operation of that department.
Copley concurred and inquired was there anything we could do better
and advised maybe a different way of saving costs. He advised we
should ask ourselves because we have always done it this way maybe
there was a better way.
Boggs advised he could ask the department heads to see if they could
bring in with their budgets several ideas on how they could cut
costs. He advised he felt the problem he would see was that most
of the departments were personnel wise pretty tight. He advised
he felt it would be pretty hard to do any significant savings although
you could nickel and dime here and there, but we’ll give it
a shot.
Copley advised he felt if they were covering one department per
meeting it wouldn’t be that big of a deal.
Boggs advised he already planned on having the department heads
start working on their budgets fairly soon as he assumed Council
would want to start reviewing it shortly.
Lapehn advised what he hears Copley saying was not so much the onus
on the department heads, who we want to believe are very conscious
of every dollar they receive for their department, but was that
we (Council) take greater responsibility for every dollar that was
spent and open it up to the public. He advised if people see or
have an idea of cost saving measures that could be put into place
and bounce them off department heads and decide if that idea could
work here in Rittman.
Copley advised yes to just get the ideas out there and give more
of a forum to (present them).
Beaumont advised maybe the Mayor could put in his article that this
was part of the long-range plan for Council to look at cost saving
methods and ask for ideas from the residents.
Carey advised back when they were discussing the sewer rate increase
it was mentioned about a covenant associated with the loan agreement
and he inquired if that was located. Carey advised he believed it
required a specific carryover balance in the sewer fund.
Mann advised she would look, but indicated the loan document was
very large and she might not even be able to locate it. Mann advised
she wasn’t trying to make excuses, but she wanted Council
to be aware there was also more than one loan document to review.
Boggs advised the city has been operating on that principle for
many years.
Carey advised the reason he asked was because when it was being
discussed it was indicated the city was required to have a certain
carryover balance and would be in default if they didn’t.
Carey advised some Council Members thought a $500 carryover balance
at the end of the year was OK and he indicated we needed to know
if we were in default of this loan if we don’t have a required
carryover balance.
Mann advised we should have at least a two months operating balance
on any of the funds as a general rule of thumb although she wasn’t
sure that was actually stated in the loan documents. She advised
what was in the loan documents, which worries her even more, was
how much they were spending on capital outlay items because that
was defined and we haven’t been keeping up with that (part
of the agreement).
Mayor William Robertson advised the Wayne County Commissioners discussed
at the (previous Council) meeting was the Model Community Grant
and there was a $25,000 for a three county area to come up with
a program. He advised he believed a lot of the programs would be
based on education to try to increase recycling and do a better
job of composting. He advised he has been working with some folks
to try to put together some information to come up with ideas on
what could be done and brainstorm some ideas. Robertson advised
City Service Director Simpson was working on it as well and they
hoped to get some heads together and there was money out there to
try to put together some kind of education program.
Beaumont advised he felt a good place to start would be through
the schools and indicated the kids could reinforce at home what
they were being taught at school regarding recycling.
Robertson advised Mrs. Sabo at the High School has been a great
advocate as she teaches an environmental class and she was helping
with some of the grant information as well.
Robertson inquired as to how do they get the word out.
Beaumont advised education was one thing, but (Rittman) was going
to get hit in the pocketbook if they don’t (increase their
recycling).
Robertson advised the Stark-Tuscarawas-Wayne Solid Waste Management
District has a great education program.
Russell advised with their help and the help of the press he felt
they could get the word out to the public as well as having the
students take home information to their parents.
Boggs indicated the refuse collection contract expires soon (Jan.
’09) and they would need to rebid it and he would be starting
to review the (bid specifications) as he has had people contact
him wanting to know when the current contract ends.
No further comments.
a. Approval
of Vouchers 47522 thru 47809 Including Then and Now
Certificates
Questions were asked regarding #’s 47671, 47718, 47760 &
47778. Lapehn so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion
carried.
Motion to Adjourn – 8:46 p.m.
Russell so moved, all Yeas on roll call and motion carried.
|